Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Urachal Mucinous Cystadenocarcinoma
  1. Ryan Pereira1,
  2. Stephen McGeorge2,
  3. Marlon Perera1 and
  4. Ian Vela1
  1. 1 Urology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2 Urology, Toowoomba Hospital, Queensland, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Marlon Perera, marlonlperera{at}gmail.com

Abstract

A 57-year-old man presented with a 6-month history of pelvic fullness. He had no lower urinary tract symptoms or altered bowel habits. On examination, there was a non-tender pelvic mass which extended from the pubic symphysis to the level of the umbilicus. CT scan of the abdomen demonstrated a 22×11×11 cm cystic mass arising from the pelvis extending into the midline and superiorly to the umbilicus. Other than raised carcinoembryonic antigen of 7.6 ng/mL (<5.0), the remainder of his blood test were unremarkable. Flexible cystoscopy demonstrated a convex deformity of the bladder wall in keeping with the compression and displacement as seen on the CT. The patient underwent an open excision of the cystic structure (urachal remnant), partial cystectomy, partial excision of anterior abdominal wall and pelvic lymphadenectomy. A check cystogram performed 12 days following the initial operation was unremarkable.

  • urological cancer
  • urological surgery

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Patient consent for publication Not required.

  • Contributors RP wrote the original draft of the manuscript. RP and MP performed the literature search. SMc and IV provided the colour images and edited the manuscript. All authors reviewed, edited and approved the final version of the manuscript. All the listed authors agree with the content of the submitted case report for publication.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.