Article Text

Download PDFPDF
Complete heart block as a herald sign for cardiac lymphoma
  1. Holly P Morgan1,
  2. Muram El-Nayir1,
  3. Christopher Jenkins2 and
  4. Philip G Campbell1
  1. 1Cardiology, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, South Wales, UK
  2. 2Haematology, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, South Wales, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Holly P Morgan; morganhp7{at}gmail.com

Abstract

A previously well 48-year-old man presented with presyncope and was found to be in complete heart block. Blood tests, echocardiography and coronary angiography were reported as normal, and a dual chamber permanent pacemaker was inserted. Six months later he re-presented with breathlessness. His chest X-ray showed cardiomegaly and echocardiography revealed a 4.4 cm pericardial effusion. A CT thorax revealed a mass originating from the intra-atrial septum, extending into the right atrium and ventricle. There were multiple pulmonary lesions suspected to be metastases. Histology demonstrated high-grade B-cell lymphoma. He was treated with eight cycles of R-CHOP chemotherapy and showed good radiological and clinical improvement. Post-treatment echocardiography found severe left ventricular dysfunction with an ejection fraction of <20%. Heart failure medical therapy was optimised and the pacemaker was upgraded to a resynchronisation device. A repeat scan 6 months post device upgrade showed an improvement in ejection fraction to 45%–50%.

  • cancer - see oncology
  • heart failure
  • pacing and electrophysiology
  • pericardial disease
  • haematology (incl blood transfusion)

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Twitter @hollymorgs

  • Contributors HPM was involved in patient communication, conception and planning and manuscript production. ME-N was both involved in planning and manuscript production. CJ was involved in patient care, review and editing of the manuscript. PC was involved in patient care, conception, review and editing of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.