Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
A case of Good’s syndrome complicated by erythema multiforme
  1. Laura R Glick1,
  2. William Wyatt Wilson2 and
  3. Michelle Fletcher3
  1. 1 Pritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  2. 2 Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  3. 3 Hospital Medicine, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Michelle Fletcher, Michelle.Fletcher{at}nm.org

Abstract

Good’s syndrome (GS) is a rare, adult-onset combined B cell and T cell immunodeficiency with an associated thymoma. These patients have an increased risk of bacterial, fungal, viral and opportunistic infections. This report describes a 75-year-old female patient who presented with a full body rash and an anterior mediastinal mass. She underwent a biopsy of her rash and mass, which revealed erythema multiforme and WHO Type A thymoma, respectively. During her hospitalisation, she was also found to have oropharyngeal candidiasis, methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia and herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) skin lesions. Based on the number of infections and severity of her rash, an immunocompromised state was suspected. Immunological testing revealed a B cell and T cell deficiency as well as low serum immunoglobulins. This combination of hypogammaglobulinaemia and thymoma led to a diagnosis of GS. While there have been many case reports of GS, this is the first report of the immunodeficiency presenting with erythema multiforme.

  • infectious diseases
  • immunology
  • dermatology
  • respiratory medicine

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors LRG, WWW and MF contributed to the drafting of the manuscript, the revision of the manuscript and the approval of the final version of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

  • Patient consent for publication Obtained.