Skip to main content
Log in

Neonatal cardiac multidetector row CT: why and how we do it

  • Pictorial Essay
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Neonatal congenital heart disease is a most difficult area of diagnostic radiology because of the small patient body size and fast resting heart rate. Recently, the spatial and temporal resolution of multidetector-row CT (MDCT) has evolved so that neonatal congenital heart disease can be precisely diagnosed. We describe the role of MDCT in neonatal congenital heart disease and offer tips for the scanning procedure to familiarize radiologists with this developing field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A et al (2005) Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 26:1482–1487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tsai IC, Lee T, Lee WL et al (2007) Use of 40-detector row computed tomography before catheter coronary angiography to select early conservative versus early invasive treatment for patients with low-risk acute coronary syndrome. J Comput Assist Tomogr 31:258–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Raff GL, Gallagher MJ, O’Neill WW et al (2005) Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 46:552–557

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Raman SV, Shah M, McCarthy B et al (2006) Multi-detector row cardiac computed tomography accurately quantifies right and left ventricular size and function compared with cardiac magnetic resonance. Am Heart J 151:736–744

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahnken AH, Koos R, Katoh M et al (2005) Assessment of myocardial viability in reperfused acute myocardial infarction using 16-slice computed tomography in comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:2042–2047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tanaka N, Ehara M, Surmely JF et al (2006) Images in cardiovascular medicine. Sixty-four-multislice computed tomography image of a ruptured coronary plaque. Circulation 114:e519–e520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee T, Tsai IC, Fu YC et al (2006) Using multi-detector row CT in neonates with complex congenital heart disease to replace diagnostic cardiac catheterization for anatomic investigation – initial experiences in technical and clinical feasibility. Pediatr Radiol 36:1273–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsai IC, Lee T, Chen MC et al (2007) Visualization of neonatal coronary arteries on multidetector row CT: ECG-gated versus non-ECG-gated technique. Pediatr Radiol 37:818–825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wikipedia (2008) SWOT analysis. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swot_analysis. Accessed 17 Jan 2008

  10. Soongswang J, Nana A, Laohaprasitiporn D et al (2000) Limitation of transthoracic echocardiography in the diagnosis of congenital heart diseases. J Med Assoc Thai 83 [Suppl 2]:S111–S117

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gutgesell HP, Huhta JC, Latson LA et al (1985) Accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiography in the diagnosis of congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 55:514–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Marek J, Skovranek J, Hucin B et al (1995) Seven-year experience of noninvasive preoperative diagnostics in children with congenital heart defects: comprehensive analysis of 2,788 consecutive patients. Cardiology 86:488–495

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tworetzky W, McElhinney DB, Brook MM et al (1999) Echocardiographic diagnosis alone for the complete repair of major congenital heart defects. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:228–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Samyn MM (2004) A review of the complementary information available with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and multi-slice computed tomography (CT) during the study of congenital heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:569–578

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Boxt LM (2004) Magnetic resonance and computed tomographic evaluation of congenital heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging 19:827–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kellenberger CJ, Yoo SJ, Buchel ER (2007) Cardiovascular MR imaging in neonates and infants with congenital heart disease. Radiographics 27:5–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chen SJ, Lee WJ, Wang JK et al (2003) Usefulness of three-dimensional electron beam computed tomography for evaluating tracheobronchial anomalies in children with congenital heart disease. Am J Cardiol 92:483–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen SJ, Lin MT, Lee WJ et al (2007) Coronary artery anatomy in children with congenital heart disease by computed tomography. Int J Cardiol 120:363–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Winer-Muram HT, Rydberg J, Johnson MS et al (2004) Suspected acute pulmonary embolism: evaluation with multi-detector row CT versus digital subtraction pulmonary arteriography. Radiology 233:806–815

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Simpson JM, Moore P, Teitel DF (2001) Cardiac catheterization of low-birth-weight infants. Am J Cardiol 87:1372–1377

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vitiello R, McCrindle BW, Nykanen D et al (1998) Complications associated with pediatric cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1433–1440

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hall EJ, Henry S (2004) Kaplan distinguished scientist award 2003. The crooked shall be made straight; dose-response relationships for carcinogenesis. Int J Radiat Biol 80:327–337

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Khursheed A, Hillier MC, Shrimpton PC et al (2002) Influence of patient age on normalized effective doses calculated for CT examinations. Br J Radiol 75:819–830

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Poll LW, Cohnen M, Brachten S et al (2002) Dose reduction in multi-slice CT of the heart by use of ECG-controlled tube current modulation (“ECG pulsing”): phantom measurements. Rofo 174:1500–1505

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tsai IC, Lee T, Chen MC et al (2007) Homogeneous enhancement in pediatric thoracic CT aortography using a novel and reproducible method: contrast-covering time. AJR 188:1131–1137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tsai IC, Lee T, Chen MC et al (2007) Gradual pulmonary artery enhancement: new sign of septal defects on CT. AJR 188:1660–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee T, Tsai IC, Fu YC et al (2007) MDCT evaluation after closure of atrial septal defect with an Amplatzer septal occluder. AJR 188:W431–W439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Cademartiri F, Nieman K, van der Lugt A et al (2004) Intravenous contrast material administration at 16-detector row helical CT coronary angiography: test bolus versus bolus-tracking technique. Radiology 233:817–823

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Park MK (2002) Pediatric cardiology for practitioners, 4th edn. Mosby, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  30. Keane JF, Lock JE, Fyler DC (2006) Nadas’ pediatric cardiology, 2nd edn. Saunders, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mavroudis C, Backer CL (2003) Pediatric cardiac surgery, 3rd edn. Mosby, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I-Chen Tsai.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(AVI 2800 kb)

Supplementary Fig. S1

(GIF 745 kb)

Supplementary Fig. S2

(GIF 2648 MB)

Supplementary Fig. S3

(GIF 775 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, IC., Chen, MC., Jan, SL. et al. Neonatal cardiac multidetector row CT: why and how we do it. Pediatr Radiol 38, 438–451 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0761-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-008-0761-9

Keywords

Navigation