Use of heparin in aortic dissection: beware the misdiagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism

BMJ Case Rep. 2013 May 2:2013:bcr2013009367. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2013-009367.

Abstract

We present a case which highlights the diagnostic difficulties between a Stanford type A aortic dissection (AD) and a pulmonary embolism (PE) and the impact it has on subsequent management. A 75-year-old man presenting with chest pain, shortness of breath and dizziness was initially suspected of having a PE and started on low-molecular-weight-heparin (LMWH). The patient was correctly diagnosed afterwards with CT of the chest to have an aortic dissection. The detrimental use of LMWH may have caused a propagation of the dissection and delayed surgical intervention of an acutely life-threatening condition. When the diagnosis is unclear, the early use of CT can help differentiate AD from PE. This in-turn can guide the management as well as the use of LMWH, which should be avoided until the correct diagnosis is confirmed.

Publication types

  • Case Reports

MeSH terms

  • Acute Disease
  • Aged
  • Aortic Aneurysm / diagnosis*
  • Aortic Dissection / diagnosis*
  • Chest Pain / diagnosis
  • Diagnostic Errors*
  • Dizziness / diagnosis
  • Dyspnea / diagnosis
  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight / adverse effects*
  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight / therapeutic use
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pulmonary Embolism / diagnosis*
  • Pulmonary Embolism / drug therapy

Substances

  • Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight