Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rectal diversion without colostomy in Fournier’s gangrene

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Techniques in Coloproctology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Fournier’s gangrene is a potentially fatal necrotizing fasciitis affecting the perineum and genital area. The usual treatment includes prompt surgical debridement and, in many cases, a diverting colostomy. We present two cases of Fournier’s gangrene that were treated with extensive local debridement and rectal diversion with a new device for faecal matter management, avoiding the need for a colostomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ravo B, Amato A, Bianco V et al (2002) Complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy: can they be prevented? Tech Coloproctol 6:83–88

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ravo B (2005) Septic complications after stapled hemorrhoidectomy. J Am Coll Surg 201:155–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ersay A, Yilmaz G, Akgun Y et al (2007) Factors affecting mortality of Fournier’s gangrene: review of 70 patients. ANZ J Surg 77:43–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Norton KS, Johnson LW, Perry T et al (2002) Management of Fournier’s gangrene: an eleven year retrospective analysis of early recognition, diagnosis, and treatment. Am Surg 68:709–713

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pizzorno R, Bonini F, Donelli A et al (1997) Hyperbaric oxygen therapy in the treatment of Fournier’s disease in 11 male patients. J Urol 158:837–840

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Moorthy K, Rao PP, Supe AN (2000) Necrotising perineal infection: a fatal outcome of ischiorectal fossa abscesses. J R Coll Surg Edinb 45:281–284

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Korkut M, Icoz G, Dayangac M et al (2003) Outcome analysis in patients with Fournier’s gangrene: report of 45 cases. Dis Colon Rectum 46:649–652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bronder CS, Cowey A, Hill J (2004) Delayed stoma formation in Fournier’s gangrene. Colorectal Dis 6:518–520

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Padmanabhan A, Stern M, Wishin J et al (2007) Clinical evaluation of a flexible fecal incontinence management system. Am J Crit Care 16:384–393

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bordes J, Goutorbe P, Asencio Y et al (2008) A non-surgical device for faecal diversion in the management of perineal burns. Burns 34:840–844

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ravo B (1988) The Coloshield. Dis Colon Rectum 31:579–580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kosorok P (1995) Colostomy tube: new device for continent colostomy. Dis Colon Rectum 38:760–763

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pescatori M (1997) Use of a rubber tube to protect endoanal sutures. Tech Coloproctol 5:32–35

    Google Scholar 

  14. Knoop M, Vorwerk T (2003) Protection of rectal anastomoses by transanal decompressive tubing. Tech Coloproctol 7:122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Page BP, Boyce SA, Deans C et al (2008) Significant rectal bleeding as a complication of a fecal collecting device: report of a case. Dis Colon Rectum 51:1427–1429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. Estrada.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Estrada, O., Martinez, I., Del Bas, M. et al. Rectal diversion without colostomy in Fournier’s gangrene. Tech Coloproctol 13, 157–159 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0474-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-009-0474-6

Key words

Navigation