Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Right-sided hydrothorax: a peritoneal dialysis dilemma
  1. Haytham Allaham,
  2. Dania Hudhud,
  3. William Salzer
  1. Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri Columbia, Columbia, Missouri, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Haytham Allaham, Allahamh{at}health.missouri.edu

Summary

We present a 23-year-old female patient with a chief complaint of progressively worsening dyspnoea of 2 days duration. Her medical history was significant for end stage renal disease secondary to membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis. A peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter was placed 8 weeks prior to admission. She did not miss any of the PD sessions prior to this admission. Vital signs were significant for hypoxemia. Physical examination was remarkable for right-sided basilar crackles with no other signs of fluid overload. A chest X-ray demonstrated the presence of a large right-sided pleural effusion. Right-sided thoracentesis was performed, with subsequent pleural fluid analysis concerning for a pleuroperitoneal leak. CT peritoneography performed confirming the diagnosis as contrast material leaked through the inferior vena cava (IVC) diaphragmatic foramen into the right pleural space. Surgical intervention was deferred in light of the close proximity of the defect to the IVC. The patient was transitioned to haemodialysis for temporary cessation of PD.

  • renal system
  • dialysis
  • fluid electrolyte and acid-base disturbances
  • respiratory medicine

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors HA was responsible for conception of the work and drafting the manuscript. DH was responsible for data collection and further revision of the manuscript. Critical revision of the article was preformed by WS. Final approval of the version to be published agreed by all the aforementioned authors.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.