Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Acute subclavian artery occlusion with associated clavicle fracture managed with bypass graft alone
  1. Dougal A S Buchanan1,
  2. David Owen2,
  3. Richard Angliss2,
  4. David N McClure1
  1. 1Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
  2. 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Barwon Health, Geelong, Victoria, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dougal A S Buchanan, doogsb{at}hotmail.com

Summary

Subclavian artery injury is a rare consequence of clavicle fracture. It most often results from penetrating trauma but can result from blunt trauma with adjacent bone fragments causing rupture, pseudoaneurysm, dissection or thrombosis of the artery. If flow through the subclavian artery is compromised there is a risk of ipsilateral upper limb ischaemia. Life-threatening haemorrhage may result in cases of laceration, and cerebral infarction may result from dissection. Vascular injury in association with clavicle fracture is typically regarded as an indication for internal fixation of the fracture. We present a case of subclavian artery thrombosis in association with a comminuted midshaft clavicle fracture causing limb ischaemia managed by carotid to brachial artery bypass without internal fracture fixation. The fracture united at 4 weeks and there was no sustained vascular or neurological impairment at follow-up. We advocate urgent vascular intervention in subclavian artery injury. There is little discussion in the literature regarding non-operative management of clavicle fractures with subclavian artery injury. We suggest that select clavicle fractures with subclavian artery injury can be safely managed non-operatively.

  • vascular surgery
  • orthopaedics
  • trauma

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors DASB: initially examined the patient and drafted the case report. DO: drafted the case report. RA: was involved in clinical decision-making and reviewing the report. DNMc: was the primary proceduralist and carer for the patient and followed up the patient.

  • Funding There is no funding to declare for this research

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.