Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Description
A 70-year-old man was admitted under the medical and ophthalmology team with a 1-day history of sudden-onset, right-sided, periorbital swelling. He denied any broken skin or local trauma. He had no relevant medical history and was not immunocompromised. On initial examination, the periorbital area was swollen, erythematous and indurated, with desquamation of the lower lid. There were no orbital signs. The patient was mildly tachycardic but afebrile. An urgent CT head demonstrated orbital cellulitis predominantly involving the preseptal space with some intraorbital extension. A degree of maxillary and ethmoid sinus opacification was also noted. A diagnosis of orbital cellulitis secondary to acute sinusitis was made, and the patient was started on intravenous Tazocin, as per local microbiology guidance.
There was initial improvement in clinical symptoms and laboratory markers; however, 48 hours after starting antibiotics, the infraorbital area deteriorated and appeared necrotic and increasingly swollen (figure 1). ENT (ear, nose and throat) input was requested to assess the possibility of acute sinusitis necessitating sinus drainage. ENT excluded acute sinusitis as the cause of orbital cellulitis following clinical and nasendoscopic examination. A repeat CT showed new preseptal gas formation in keeping with necrotising fasciitis (NF) (figure 2). The patient was taken urgently to the theatre for debridement. Necrotic skin, orbicularis oculi and adipose tissue were debrided, with preservation of the tarsal margin. Group A (beta-haemolytic) streptococcus was isolated from the wound cultures. The patient had a good postoperative recovery and the wound granulated well. He was discharged with metronidazole and once-daily intravenous ceftriaxone, with maxillofacial and oculoplastic follow-up.
Orbital cellulitis is commonly caused secondary to acute sinusitis, following the spread of infection through the lamina papyracea. However, radiological evidence of sinus opacification in patients presenting with orbital cellulitis is not diagnostic of orbital cellulitis secondary to acute sinusitis. In fact, CT findings of sinus opacification are a common, non-specific finding. CT, while valuable, is not a substitute for ENT assessment and nasendoscopic examination. It is important to involve specialists early who can assist in diagnosis. This case demonstrates that rare differentials must always be considered, especially when symptoms of acute sinusitis are not present.
NF is a serious, life-threatening infection of the subcutaneous tissue and underlying fascia.1 NF of the periorbital region is extremely rare, with a UK incidence of 0.24 per million per annum.2 Periorbital NF often develops following trauma; however, interestingly this patient developed unprovoked NF.2 3 Patients with NF are typically systemically unwell, often with septic shock, and are classically immunocompromised or diabetic.4 However, as with this case, patients with periorbital NF are more likely to remain systemically well with the infection and are often healthy, non-immunocompromised individuals; Amrith et al 5 found that 52.1% of patients had no prior pre-existing illness. This may further lower the clinical suspicion of NF and result in misdiagnosis.6 It is therefore important to always consider NF as a differential in cases of periorbital cellulitis and keep a high index of suspicion. Periorbital NF is associated with significant morbidity, including loss of vision (14%), soft-tissue defects affecting cosmesis and function, and a 3.4%–10% risk of mortality.2 3 Repeat assessment and examination of the patient is important, as prompt diagnosis and early surgical debridement are crucial in reducing this risk.7 8
Learning points
Periorbital necrotising fasciitis often occurs in non-immunocompromised individuals, who can remain systemically well and can occur without any history of trauma.
Misdiagnosis is common in necrotising fasciitis.6 Clinicians should have a high index of suspicion when assessing patients with cellulitis, especially those who deteriorate despite antibiotic therapy.
CT findings of sinus opacification are a common finding and are not diagnostic of acute sinusitis. CT, while valuable, is not a substitute for ENT (ear, nose and throat) assessment and nasendoscopic examination.
This case highlights the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to the management of cellulitis. Local hospital cellulitis guidelines should include early surgical consult to assist in diagnosis, with either ENT, general surgery, orthopaedics or plastic surgery depending on the anatomical location. Prompt diagnosis and early surgical debridement can prevent mortality and reduce morbidity.
Footnotes
Contributors LL: drafting of manuscript. CS and NB: reviewing and revising of manuscript.
Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Competing interests None declared.
Patient consent Obtained.
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.