Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Orbitocerebral mucormycosis and intracranial haemorrhage: a role for caution with steroids in suspected giant cell arteritis
  1. Harsh Bhatt1,2,
  2. Gulam Zilani2,
  3. Caroline Hayhurst2
  1. 1Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  2. 2Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
  1. Correspondence to Harsh Bhatt, bhatthp{at}cardiff.ac.uk

Summary

A 75-year-old man with type 2 diabetes mellitus presented with complete loss of vision in his right eye and severe headaches for the past 24 hours. He had been treated for suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA) with high-dose corticosteroids which were being tapered to stop after an inconclusive right temporal artery biopsy and an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) value of 8. His current acute presentation, however, raised further concern for partially treated GCA and precipitated treatment with pulsed methylprednisolone. The patient, taking metformin, developed diabetic ketoacidosis and was transferred to the intensive care unit where a swollen, painful right eye with chemosis and complete ophthalmoplegia was subsequently revealed to be secondary to cavernous sinus thrombosis. Rhino-orbital skin necrosis with positive samples for the organism Rhizopus on eventual orbital exenteration revealed angioinvasive fungal infection, mucormycosis, to be the cause. We discuss here the lessons learnt, and how best to treat a susceptible cohort within our ageing western population.

  • neurosurgery
  • infectious diseases
  • vasculitis
  • neuroimaging
  • contraindications and precautions

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors HB authored the manuscript. GZ and CH revised it for key content. CH was also the senior clinician, with all authors contributing to the patient’s care as well as draft revisions prior to final submission.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Next of kin consent obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.