Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Dentin dysplasia: diagnostic challenges
  1. Ahmed Alhilou1,
  2. Hannah P Beddis1,
  3. Alan J Mighell2,
  4. Kathryn Durey1
  1. 1 Restorative Dentistry, Leeds Dental Institute, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK
  2. 2 Oral Medicine, Leeds Dental Institute, Leeds, Leeds, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ahmed Alhilou, A.Alhilou{at}leeds.ac.uk

Summary

Dentin dysplasia(DD) is a rare autosomal dominant disorder associated with disturbance of the dentin. While the crowns appear clinically normal, on radiography, the pulp spaces appear partially or completely obliterated, with short blunted roots, and multiple periapical radiolucencies affecting the apparently sound teeth. Clinical signs include spontaneous abscess formation or increased tooth mobility which can lead to exfoliation. DD can therefore have a significant impact on the patient’s dentition, and treatment is often challenging. Shields’ classification of dentin disorders has been recently criticised for failing to consider differential variations and expressions of these disorders. This paper describes a case of a 23-year-old woman with previously undiagnosed DD, who presented with clinical and histological features belonging to several of these diseases, thus highlighting the potential diagnostic challenges faced with Shields’ classification.

  • dentistry and oral medicine
  • genetics

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors HPB, KD and AJM assisted in the clinical management of this patient and critical proof-reading of this manuscript. AA provided treatment for this patient and is the main author of this manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.