Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Optic nerve grey crescent: an assessment using swept-source OCT
Free
  1. Amar Pujari,
  2. Rohan Chawla,
  3. Shreyas Temkar,
  4. Mohamed Ibrahime Asif
  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Dr. Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, AIIMS, New Delhi, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Amar Pujari, dramarpujari{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

Optic nerve head is an area of opening within the scleral canal; pigmentary changes at the margins and around the disc encompass a few important differential diagnoses. Optic nerve head grey crescent is one such clinical entity where it is characterised by bilateral greyish pigmentation of the temporal neuroretinal rims. The appearance is due to an internal extension of Bruch’s layer into the peripapillary scleral canal. It was first noted by Shields in 1980 in African-American patients. The pigmentation mainly lies within the optic nerve head; in contrast, the alpha and beta zone lies outside the optic nerve head. The beta zone of peripapillary region is mainly an atrophy of the choroid and retinal layers for a varying degree with underlying visible sclera, whereas the crescent area is an area of encroachment of the peripapillary layers onto the disc. The clinical implication of this clinical entity is that this area of pigmentation masks the underlying healthy neuroretinal rim leading to misinterpretation and overestimation of the size of the optic disc cupping and false-positive diagnosis of glaucoma.1 2

Here we discuss one such case using swept-source optical coherence tomography (OCT) to delineate the actual anatomical margins of the optic nerve head who was diagnosed with glaucoma. In a 40-year-old male patient having a visual acuity of 20/20 in each eye with unremarkable anterior segment showed normal-sized optic disc (green arrows) with crescentic greyish appearance of the temporal neuroretinal rim leading to overestimation of the optic disc cupping (figure 1A,B black arrows). Intraocular pressures were normal; swept-source OCT revealed the edge of the hyper-reflective RPE–Bruch’s membrane complex corresponding to the crescent-shaped temporal disc margin (figure 1C,D, yellow arrows). Subsequently, Optical coherence tomography angiography  (OCTA) at the level of superficial choroidal layer delineated the actual margins of the optic disc with overlying continuity of the retinal vessels (figure 1E,F, yellow arrows), whereas the falsely concluded margin of the optic disc canal lies significantly within the actual margins (white arrows). The patient was reassured and kept under follow-up. Arterial ring of Zinn-Haller can also be appreciated (blue arrow).3

Figure 1

(A and B) Both eyes with normal-sized optic disc showing greyish pigmentation of the temporal margin (between green and black arrows). (C and D) SSOCT showing thickened RPE–Bruch’s complex at the level of the scleral canal. (E and F) OCTA at the level of choriocapillaris delineated the actual margin (green arrows), which is well beyond the falsely concluded margins (white arrows). Branches of arterial ring of Zinn-Haller can be appreciated (blue arrow). SSOCT, swept-source optical coherence tomography.

Learning points

  • Better anatomical understanding of the optic nerve head and its relation with the surrounding peripapillary retina is possible using swept-source optical coherence tomography.

  • The actual margin of the optic disc lies beyond the clinically appreciable margins, which was appreciated quite accurately.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors have evaluated the case in detail. After critically analysing the educational value of the case, all authors wrote the report together.

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.