Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Borderline Mucinous Testicular Tumour: Diagnostic and Management difficulties
  1. Krishan Pratap1,2,
  2. Marlon Perera1,
  3. Frances Malczewski3,
  4. Rachel Esler1
  1. 1 Department of Urology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2 University of Queensland School of Medicine, Herston, Queensland, Australia
  3. 3 Department of Pathology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Marlon Perera, marlonlperera{at}gmail.com

Summary

A 45-year-old man presented with right-sided testicular swelling and pain. An examination found a tender, firm right testis, a clinically normal left testis and no palpable lymphadenopathy. Tumour and inflammatory markers were within normal limits. A scrotal ultrasound scan showed an intratesticular, avascular lesion measuring 4.4×2.6×1.8 cm. A CT scan of his chest/abdomen/pelvis (CT C/A/P) showed no metastatic or primary lesions. An elective right-inguinal orchidectomy was subsequently performed. Histopathology showed a cystic mucinous tumour lined with intestinal-type epithelium. Differentials of metastatic adenocarcinoma, possibly of a gastrointestinal origin, a monodermal teratoma, or a borderline mucinous tumour of the testicle (BMTT) were considered. Following 12 p genetic studies and a colonoscopy, both of which found no abnormalities, a presumptive diagnosis of a BMTT was made. The patient is to have an annual urological review with a CT C/A/P and 5 yearly colonoscopies.

  • cancer intervention
  • urological cancer

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors KP: data collection, manuscript preparation MP: manuscript preparation FM: data collection RE: project supervision, primary clinician.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.