Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Challenges of assessing response to therapy in non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the bone
  1. Megan Rose Paul,
  2. Dennis John Kuo
  1. Department of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Dennis John Kuo, dekuo{at}ucsd.edu

Summary

A 17-year-old male adolescent was diagnosed with diffuse large B cell lymphoma arising from the right humeral head. The lymphoma was found to be isolated to the bone, with a very small extraosseous component. After completion of a standard chemotherapy regimen, the Positron Emission Tomography-Computed Tomography (PET-CT) became PET negative but the CT and MRI appeared mostly unchanged in appearance, suggesting refractory disease. Repeat biopsy confirmed that no lymphoma remained, and he was in complete remission. Three months after completion of therapy, MRI continued to be abnormal. This case illustrates the unique challenges posed by the imaging characteristics of bone lymphoma, both during and after therapy. Biopsy is definitive but causes additional morbidity and may not be necessary. Imaging is done routinely to assess response to therapy, as with this patient, but in lymphomas of the bone imaging can be misleading and can lead to unnecessary procedures or follow-up imaging.

  • paediatric oncology
  • radiology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Both authors (MRP and DJK) fully participated in the care of the patient, the conception, design, writing and editing of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.