Article Text

Download PDFPDF

CASE REPORT
Ureterosciatic hernia treated with ureteral stent placement
  1. Yusuke Nakazawa,
  2. Nobuyo Morita,
  3. Ippei Chikazawa,
  4. Katsuhito Miyazawa
  1. Urology, Kanazawa Medical University, Kahoku-gun, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Yusuke Nakazawa, nkzw-y{at}kanazawa-med.ac.jp

Summary

A 92-year-old female with a history of asthma and chronic heart failure presented with left lumber back pain. Physical examination revealed knocking tenderness at the left costal-vertebral angle. Laboratory test results were within normal limits. Abdominal CT showed a left hydroureteronephrosis and an obstruction in the left distal ureter with herniation into the sciatic foramen. A ureteral stent was inserted into the left ureter and was removed after 2 months. She has not complained of pain or showed symptoms since the removal. Our case suggests that doctors consider the possibility of ureterosciatic hernias when examining older patients complaining of lower back pain.

  • catheterisation / catheter care
  • urology

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors YN reviewed the literature and wrote the manuscript. NM followed the patient in the outpatient setting and helped write the manuscript. IC and KM reviewed the literature and the contents of the manuscript.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.