Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Total patellectomy with extensor mechanism reconstruction following pathological fracture due to patellar Ewing’s sarcoma
  1. Eyad Alqasim1,
  2. Abdulla Aljowder2,
  3. Naji Alammari3,
  4. Amani A Joudeh4
  1. 1Orthopaedic Surgery, King Hamad University Hospital, Muharraq, Bahrain
  2. 2Orthopaedic Surgery, Bahrain Defence Force Royal Medical Services, Riffa, Bahrain
  3. 3Orthopaedic Surgery, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  4. 4Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Eyad Alqasim, dreyadalqasim{at}hotmail.com

Summary

A young patient presented with a progressive right knee pain and swelling that was worse on ambulation. Following appropriate investigations, he was confirmed having Ewing’s sarcoma of the right patella. Two cycles of chemotherapy were initiated before he sustained a fall and a resultant pathological patellar fracture. He finally underwent a total right patellectomy and extensor mechanism reconstruction using Achilles tendon allograft in an attempt to eradicate the disease and salvage his knee extensor mechanism. At 1-year follow-up, no disease recurrence was observed, and the patient had a full range of motion but with slight weakness of the extensor mechanism.

  • musculoskeletal and joint disorders
  • chemotherapy
  • patellofemoral pain
  • ligament rupture
  • orthopaedic and trauma surgery

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors EA raised the idea of writing the article. He identified the case and was involved in the clinical and operative management of the patient. He made substantial contribution in the research, writing, analysis, interpretation and final approval of the work. He is also the guarantor of the paper. AA was involved in the research of the work. NA made substantial contribution in the interpretation of the work. AAJ provided extensive pathological analysis of the specimens which she later reviewed many times and summarised to fit in the article appropriately. She also provided high quality images of the slides and made substantial contribution in the research of the work.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.