Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
The mass effect of a slowly growing GIST
  1. Deepali Prakash1,
  2. Leandro Siragusa1,
  3. Saj Wajed2,3,
  4. Antonio Manzelli2,3
  1. 1Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
  2. 2Department of Upper Gastrointestinal and Emergency Surgery, Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK
  3. 3Surgery, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Deepali Prakash, drdeepaliprakash08{at}gmail.com

Summary

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) are typically defined as solid masses arising from the GI tract, most commonly from the stomach and small intestine. They seldom present in a cystic form. Management of cystic masses arising from the GI tract may pose a diagnostic predicament. We had one such case that presented itself with complaints of a slow growing intra-abdominal mass. An ultrasound scan demonstrated a thick-walled cystic lesion arising from the pelvis. Further imaging evaluations in the form of a CT scan revealed a complex large cystic mass arising from left upper quadrant (see Figure 1). Due to the uncertainty of origin of this mass and lack of invasion or lymphadenopathy, it was thought to be benign. After a multidisciplinary meeting, it was concluded that an urgent surgical excision of this benign mass was the best treatment. The surgical treatment of which entailed a 10 hours surgery to resect this 10 kg lesion, which comprised 7 L fluid and 3 kg solid mass. Histopathology aided in the diagnosis of this lesion as a CD117-positive and DOG1-positive GIST.

  • cancer intervention
  • gastrointestinal system
  • stomach and duodenum
  • gastrointestinal surgery
  • surgical oncology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AM: operated on this patient and thought of writing up this case report. LS and DP: did a literature search. DP: wrote this article. SW: provided additional information and contributed to the discussion. AM: takes full responsibility of completed article.

  • Funding This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.