Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Successful perioperative management in a patient with factor XI deficiency
  1. Margaret L McCarthy1,
  2. Sarah M Ordway2,
  3. Ryan M Jones3,
  4. Jeremy G Perkins3
  1. 1Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington DC, Columbia, USA
  2. 2Internal Medicine, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  3. 3Hematology-Oncology, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
  1. Correspondence to Margaret L McCarthy, margaretlmccarthy{at}gmail.com

Summary

Factor XI (FXI) deficiency is an autosomal disorder which manifests as bleeding of varying severity. While homozygotes typically experience more dramatic bleeding symptoms, heterozygotes may experience clinically significant bleeding following surgical procedures or trauma, and therefore the condition is not purely recessive. The clinical significance of FXI deficiency is complicated in that FXI levels do not correlate well with bleeding severity, and in fact the bleeding risk is variable even for an individual in response to different haemostatic challenges. We present the case of a 74-year-old man of Ashkenazi Jewish heritage with a family and personal history of bleeding during surgical procedures, who presented with excessive bleeding following total thyroidectomy. He was found to have a FXI level of 52% (low normal). Genetic testing revealed that he was heterozygous for the c.403G>T mutation. This case demonstrates successful work-up and perioperative management of a patient with FXI deficiency.

  • haematology (incl blood transfusion)
  • genetics

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors contributed to the manuscript as follows: Interpretation of data and background research, drafting and revision of the manuscript and final approval of the submitted version.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.