Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
‘Clinically suspected myocarditis with pseudoinfarct presentation’ complicated with left ventricular aneurysm
  1. Annick Haouzi1,
  2. Ahmed Ahmed2
  1. 1Heart and Vascular Institute, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
  2. 2Department of Cardiology, St Bernards Heart and Vascular, Jonesboro, Arkansas, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Annick Haouzi, ahaouzi{at}pennstatehealth.psu.edu

Summary

A 51-year-old man presented with chest pain, high troponin level, inflammatory syndrome and ST-segment elevation in the anterior leads. While the transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) showed anteroseptal hypokinesis and apical akinesis, the coronary angiogram was normal. Cardiac MR demonstrated a typical aspect of myocarditis (multiple areas of mid-myocardial late gadolinium enhancement, sparing the subendocardial layer, along with oedema). The initial diagnosis was clinically suspected myocarditis with pseudoinfarct presentation. However, the short-term evolution was not typical of this syndrome, since an apical transmural scar with aneurysm developed within 2 weeks. Seven years later, the patient remained asymptomatic, while Q waves persisted in anterior leads along with an apical aneurysm on TTE. A transmural myocardial necrosis with aneurysm is an unusual complication of acute myocarditis. The potential mechanisms accounting for the development of these lesions are reviewed, and the clinical implications for the diagnosis and monitoring of acute myocarditis are discussed.

  • cardiovascular medicine
  • clinical diagnostic tests
  • radiology (diagnostics)

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AH contributed to the conception, design, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data presented in the manuscript, drafted and revised the manuscript, approved the version to be submitted and will be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. AA contributed to the design of the work and the acquisition of data, drafted the original case report, provided some of the references, selected some of the figures, approved the version to be submitted and will be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.