Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Intracaval misplacement of a double-J ureteral stent
  1. Vera Marques1,
  2. Belmiro Parada1,2,
  3. Francisco Rolo1,
  4. Arnaldo Figueiredo1,2
  1. 1Serviço de Urologia e Transplantação Renal, Centro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
  2. 2Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
  1. Correspondence to Dr Vera Marques, vm.veramarques{at}gmail.com

Summary

Double-J ureteral stent (DJUS) is an important therapeutic tool in endourology. There are well-known frequent complications associated with DJUS placement such as distal and proximal migration within the urinary tract. However, perforation and stent misplacement are uncommon but serious complications of this technique. We present a case of a 63-year-old man who had a misplacement of a DJUS into the inferior vena cava during an elective procedure of ureteral catheterisation. The stent placement was performed under fluoroscopic control and it seemed well positioned. Actually, the DJUS was misplaced in the inferior vena cava after drilling at the level of the crossing of the ureter with the ipsilateral iliac vessels. Diagnosis was incidentally made 3 months after the placement of the stent in a renal CT scan. The patient was always asymptomatic. We performed an endoscopic removal of the ureteral stent, which took place without complications.

  • urological surgery
  • catheterisation / catheter care
  • urology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Conception or design of the work: VM, BP, FR. Data collection: VM, BP. Data analysis and interpretation: VM, BP. Drafting the article: VM, BP, AF. Critical revision of the article: VM, BP, FR, AF. Final approval of the version to be published: VM, BP, FR, AF.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.