Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Anterior spinal cord infarct: a rare yet disabling stroke
  1. Nikunj Davda1,
  2. Chinar Osman2
  1. 1Department of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, London, UK
  2. 2Department of Neurology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Nikunj Davda, nikunj01{at}hotmail.com

Summary

We present a case which demonstrates the classical clinical symptoms and signs evident in an anterior spinal cord syndrome and explains the anatomical basis for the features seen with respect to the ascending and descending tracts in the spinal cord. It also demonstrates the clinical importance in conducting a detailed sensory examination to look for dissociated sensory loss and ascertaining the level of the pathology within the cord. The patient had made improvements following over a month of extensive rehabilitation on a specialist stroke unit.

  • stroke
  • spinal cord

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors ND is the SHO on the team looking after the patient. His contribution included collecting the clinical information about the case and writing up the case report and discussion. He sourced the diagrams used in the discussion of the care report. CO was the neurology registrar who was involved in the case and provided advice to the ND’s team looking after the patient. After ND’ s initial draft, CO reviewed and edited and rewrote several paragraphs throughout the case report. CO also collected the appropriate radiological images and discussed the images with the neuroradiologist in order to ensure that author’ s description of them was accurate.

  • Funding The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.