Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Dysphagia caused by an inverted papilloma
Free
  1. Luís Cardoso,
  2. João Fonseca Neves,
  3. João Carlos Ribeiro
  1. Centro Hospitalar e Universitario de Coimbra EPE, Coimbra, Portugal
  1. Correspondence to Dr Luís Cardoso, luis.cardoso{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

A previously healthy 57-year-old man presented with progressive dysphagia and sore throat with 1-month duration. Nasal obstruction was present but neglected. Examination revealed an enormous mass in the posterior wall of the oropharynx (figure 1) pending from the nasopharynx (figure 2), blocking the left nasal cavity and reaching the epiglottis. Differential diagnosis includes benign lesions such antrochoanal polyp, inflammatory polyp, angiofibroma or encephalocele and malignant neoplasms like epidermoid carcinoma or adenocarcinoma.1 At the beginning, for its clinical appearance, it was considered as an antrochoanal polyp. An office biopsy was performed, and the histopathological report confirmed a benign inverted papilloma with an exceptional presentation. A 14 cm inverted papilloma, arising from the left lateral nasal wall, was endoscopically resected, and no recurrence occurred after 1 year of follow-up. Unlike other benign lesions, close follow-up is mandatory in inverted papillomas because recurrence occur in 12%–15% and malignant transformation in 7%–9%.2 3

Figure 1

Papilloma in the posterior wall of the oropharynx.

Figure 2

Papilloma being pulled out from the back of the nose to the mouth with forceps.

Learning points

  • Large inverted papilloma can be a cause of dysphagia.

  • Inverted papillomas are macroscopically indistinguishable from other nasal lesions.

  • This case exemplifies the importance of seeing beyond the obvious and keeping in mind a vast differential diagnosis.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors contributed to the manuscript as follows: LC drafted the article. JFN revision of the article. JCR final approval of the version to be published. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.