Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Rose thorn injury
Free
  1. Katarina Kieselova,
  2. Felicidade Santiago,
  3. Martinha Henrique
  1. Department of Dermatology, Centro Hospitalar Leiria, Leiria, Portugal
  1. Correspondence to Dr Katarina Kieselova, katarinakieselova{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

A 71-year-old man, with a history of arterial hypertension, presented with a 4-month history of four painful progressively enlarging nodules on the dorsal aspect of the right hand. The patient reported that he had been pricked by a rose on the fourth finger approximately 3 weeks before the appearance of the first lesion on the site of the injury. On physical examination, we observed four erythematous nodules, 10–15 mm in diameter, in linear distribution extending from the hand proximally (figure 1). Two nodules presented superficial erosions with purulent secretion. No systemic symptoms were detected. Histopathology revealed epidermal hyperkeratosis and suppurative small granulomas with polymorphous dermal infiltrate and periodic acid-Schiff staining identified rare fungal spores (figure 2). Culture from the biopsy specimen was negative. Clinical presentation and histology were consistent with sporotrichosis, so the patient was given itraconazole 200 mg daily. After 3 months of treatment, only a mild improvement was observed; therefore, the dose was escalated to 200 mg twice daily during following 4 months with complete resolution of 3 lesions. The fourth lesion was excised completely. There was no recurrence of the disease after 2-year follow-up.

Figure 1

Four nodules on the dorsal aspect of the hand and forearm.

Figure 2

(A) Histology shows suppurative granulomas in dermis with overlying acanthotic epidermis and the areas of pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia (H&E, ×100). (B) Small granulomas composed of histiocytes, neutrophils and giant multinucleated cells are observed (H&E, ×100). (C) Oval fungal spores and yeast-like forms may be seen (periodic acid-Schiff, ×400).

Sporothrix schenckii, a saprophytic fungus, causes chronic infection, most frequently limited to skin and superficial lymphatics. Sporotrichosis presents as reddish papules at the site of inoculation, usually 3 weeks after the penetrating injury, with progression through the lymphatics forming multiple cutaneous nodules.1 Systemic sporotrichosis is rare and occurs from the haematogenous spread from the primary inoculation site or from the pulmonary sporotrichosis in immunocompromised patients.2

Learning points

  • Sporotrichosis is a rare chronic granulomatous mycotic infection caused by a bimorphic fungus Sporothrix schenckii. The most common form of sporotrichosis is a lymphocutaneous infection, which is caused by traumatic inoculation from contaminated plants, soil or through zoonotic transmission.

  • The diagnosis of sporotrichosis is based on clinical presentation, epidemiological context together with laboratory studies (direct examination, culture and tissue histopathology).1

  • Itraconazole 200 mg daily for at least 3–6 months is the treatment of choice for the lymphocutaneous disease. Non-responders should be given itraconazole 200 mg twice daily, terbinafine 500 mg twice daily or saturated solution of potassium iodide if itraconazole is not available. Possible adverse side effects of the prolonged systemic antifungal treatment (headache, gastrointestinal, dermatological manifestation) or prolonged potassium iodide administration (endocrine, gastrointestinal and renal) require careful clinical and laboratory monitoring.1

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors All persons who meet authorship criteria are listed as authors. KK wrote the manuscript, reviewed by FS. KK performed the literature review. FS and MH made the diagnosis and performed the complete investigation and management of the patient. All authors approved the final version of manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.