Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Endoscopic surgical management of a large Morel-Lavallée lesion
  1. Andrew Walls1,
  2. Samuel E McMahon2,
  3. Jonathan MacDonald2,
  4. Jonathan Bunn1
  1. 1Trauma and Orthopaedics, Southern Health and Social Care Trust, Portadown, UK
  2. 2Trauma and Orthopaedics, Western Health and Social Care Trust, Londonderry, UK
  1. Correspondence to Jonathan MacDonald, jdrmacdonald{at}live.com

Summary

The Morel-Lavallée lesion is a closed degloving injury that usually occurs following high-energy trauma. We present a case demonstrating endoscopic management of this lesion. A 44-year-old man fell from scaffolding. Initial assessment demonstrated no significant injury. An ultrasound scan 2 days post injury revealed a large fluid collection along the lateral right thigh. This subsequently became infected and did not respond to antibiotic therapy.

Due to the extent of the lesion, we were reluctant to perform a traditional open drainage. An endoscopic probe was inserted at the proximal and distal poles of the lesion and the wound debrided.

This resulted in a rapid improvement in symptoms and a complete resolution of the lesion at 1 year postsurgery, with no wound-associated morbidity.

This is only the second description of endoscopic debridement of a large, acute Morel-Lavallée lesion, with an excellent outcome.

  • Trauma
  • Orthopaedics
  • Orthopaedic and trauma surgery

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AW: concept of case report, initial write up and editing. SEM: literature search, write up of report and editing. JM: literature search, write up and editing. JB: concept, overall supervision and editing of report.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.