Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Whipple’s endocarditis presenting as ulnar artery aneurysm; if you don’t look, you won’t find
  1. Owen Seddon1,
  2. Irasha Hettiarachchi2
  1. 1Department of Public Health Wales, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
  2. 2Microbiology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Owen Seddon, owen.seddon2{at}wales.nhs.uk

Summary

A 54-year-old female patient presented to her local district general hospital with a painful, swollen left arm. Imaging revealed an ulnar artery aneurysm. The aetiology was embolic, with an echocardiogram revealing vegetations on the aortic valve. The patient was treated empirically for 6 weeks with amoxicillin and gentamicin for endocarditis. Eight months later, she had an elective aortic valve replacement for symptomatic aortic regurgitation. The valve was culture negative but analysis by 16S rDNA PCR was positive for Tropheryma whipplei. In retrospect, the ulnar artery aneurysm and a history of arthralgia were attributed to an underlying diagnosis of Whipple’s endocarditis. She continues on antibiotic treatment with resolution of her arthralgia and no clinical signs of infection. Once thought to be rare entity, molecular assays have revolutionised the diagnosis of Whipple’s endocarditis, but this case highlights the difficulties and pitfalls in diagnosis.

  • valvular diseases
  • infectious diseases
  • cardiothoracic surgery

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors IH coordinated the patients microbiological investigations, was involved in managing the patient postoperatively and obtained the patients consent for publication. OS managed the patient postoperatively and helped the patient provide her perspective. OS and IH jointly prepared the manuscript for publication.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.