BMJ Case Reports 2017; doi:10.1136/bcr-2017-220926
  • Rare disease

A case of De Garengeot hernia and literature review

Open Access
  1. Chin Li Tee2
  1. 1General Surgery, Caboolture Hospital, Caboolture, Queensland, Australia
  2. 2General Surgery, Caboolture Hospital, Caboolture, Queensland, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Bardia Bidarmaghz, bardiab1985{at}
  • Accepted 23 August 2017
  • Published 7 September 2017


Femoral hernia accounts for only 3% of all the hernias and in only 0.5%–5% of the events, the appendix can travel through the femoral hernia which is called De Garengeot hernia, and the incidence of appendicitis in this type of hernia is as low as 0.08%–0.13%. We present a case of a 69-year-old healthy woman who was referred to the emergency department by her general practitioner for CT-proven appendicitis in the femoral canal. On initial assessment, she was found to have a hard, tender lump in her right groin below the inguinal ligament, and open appendectomy and herniorrhaphy were performed. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment of this type of hernia but due to the rarity of this condition, there is no specific guideline as for the surgical procedure. This article demonstrated a case of De Garengeot hernia which was diagnosed preoperatively and managed surgically.


Femoral hernia occurs as the result of protrusion of abdominal content through the femoral canal medial to the femoral artery and below the inguinal ring. This type of hernia is more common in women and accounts for only 3% of all the hernias and has 15%–20% chance of strangulation because of the narrow femoral neck.1 In only 0.5%–5% of the events, the appendix can travel through the femoral hernia which is called De Garengeot hernia,2 and the incidence of appendicitis in this type of hernia is as low as 0.08%–0.13%.3 De Garengeot hernia is a rare clinical presentation and there is no published guideline regarding the procedure of choice,4 and it must be differentiated from Amyand hernia, which is the presence of appendix inside an inguinal hernia.5 We present a case of preoperatively diagnosed De Garengeot hernia and review the literature to help the readers to have a better understanding of this case scenario.

Case presentation

A 69-year-old healthy woman was referred by her general practitioner (GP) for CT-proven appendicitis present in right-sided femoral hernia (figure 1). For the past 7 days, she had noticed a lump in her right groin which was initially reducible and associated with mild discomfort on exertion, but it was getting more painful during the past 24 hours accompanied by low-grade fever. She denied nausea, vomiting and her bowel motion was normal. The patient saw her GP due to worsening of the pain, and an ultrasound was organised which demonstrated a right-sided femoral hernia below the inguinal ligament that contained the appendix. There was a small amount of fluid around the appendix and increased vascularity which was suggestive of appendicitis. CT was then ordered by patient’s primary physician and the scan confirmed the presence of an inflamed appendix inside femoral hernia sac; therefore she was transferred to emergency department. She was an independent, non-smoker woman with no significant medical history apart from mild gastro-oesophageal reflux and vaginal hysterectomy 20 years ago.

Figure 1

Abdominopelvic CT scan. Transverse view: inflamed appendix (red arrow) inside the femoral ring (white arrow), medial to the femoral vein (white asterisk) and femoral artery (red asterisk). Sagittal view: tubular structure inside the hernia sac. Coronal view: inflamed appendix with adjacent fat stranding.


On arrival to the emergency department, she was complaining of discomfort in her right groin and had blood pressure of 140/80 mm Hg, pulse rate of 99 bpm, respiratory rate of 15 breaths per minute and temperature of 37.8°C. On examination, there was an obvious swelling on the medial side of the right groin extending to the thigh with normal skin colour and temperature. By palpating the swelling, a tender hard lump could be felt below the inguinal ligament which did not have cough impulse and was partially reducible. The rest of the abdominal examination was unremarkable and there was no sign of bowel obstruction of peritonitis. Blood tests were requested that showed normal full blood count and electrolytes—white cell counts of 6×109/L with normal neutrophil count.

Differential diagnosis

The clinical picture of a tender right groin mass is commonly associated with an incarcerated or strangulated femoral or inguinal hernia, and the patient may be feverish and laboratory values can be atypical. De Garengeot hernia should be suspected in an elderly woman presenting with signs and symptoms of a strangulated hernia. The differential diagnosis should include, in addition to inguinal hernia, adnexitis, a varix node, ectasia of the Vena saphena magna, lipomas or other soft tissue tumours, lymphomas and hypostatic abscesses in retroperitoneal processes.6 In our case, the patient had already been diagnosed with De Garengeot hernia by her GP after having CT scan.


The patient was kept nil by mouth and after establishing intravenous access, intravenous fluid started. She received intravenous antibiotics (metronidazole 500 mg, gentamicin 280 mg, amoxicillin 1 g) along with analgesia and transferred to the theatre for emergent appendectomy and reduction of the femoral hernia. Under general anaesthesia, a modified McEvedy method was used and a transverse incision 2 cm above the pubic tubercle was made; and after dissecting the rectus sheath, safe entry into the peritoneum was achieved. The lacunar ligament was carefully incised to allow reduction of the appendix. An inflamed appendix without signs of perforation was found and appendectomy was performed (figure 2). Afterwards, the femoral hernia repair was achieved by placing 1–0 Prolene suture between inguinal ligament and cooper ligament to fix the defect. Decision was made not to use mesh to reduce the risk of infection and peritoneum closed with 2–0 Vicryl and abdominal wall muscles closed with non-absorbable sutures. After closing the skin, local anaesthetic infiltrated around the incision line and patient transferred back to the ward.

Figure 2

Intraoperative picture of the appendix with inflammatory changes.

Outcome and follow-up

She made an uneventful recovery and discharged the day after the procedure. A few days later, histopathology result came back which showed serosal and subserosal inflammation and fibroblastic proliferation in the appendix along with femoral hernia sac contents. She was seen in the surgical outpatient clinic 2 weeks later and had a clean, well-healed surgical scar.


Rene Jacques Croissant de Garengeot was a French surgeon from Paris who first described De Garengeot hernia in 1731,7 but it was Hevin who performed the first appendectomy on a patient with De Garengeot hernia in 1785.8 Reflecting the higher incidence of femoral hernia in women,9 this type of hernia predominately affects postmenopausal women four times more, comparing to the men population.10 The median age for De Garengeot hernia is 55 years and risk factors for developing it are pregnancy-related changes, smoking, chronic cough, constipation and older age.10 There are two main theories to explain this condition. The first one emphasises on abnormal attachment of appendix to the caecum secondary to embryogenic rotations, and the second one claims that a large caecum can push the appendix into the femoral hernia sac.11 The sequence of the presence of appendicitis inside femoral sac is also controversial and unclear whether appendicitis happens first and then it migrates into the femoral hernia, or appendicitis occurs while the appendix had already engaged inside the femoral hernia. Followers of the latter scenario advocate that extraluminal compression of the appendix is more likely because of narrow neck of femoral hernia.4

De Garengeot hernia clinically presents with a groin lump (often erythematous) which is irreducible and tender to touch. Patient can have fever with signs and symptoms of bowel obstruction or shock.6 Sepsis and peritonitis are relatively uncommon because of the anatomical structure of the femoral canal which means that perforation is confined to this area and not spilled over to the peritoneal cavity.12

Most of the times, De Garengeot hernia is diagnosed intraoperatively and there are few cases that imaging already led to establishing diagnosis preoperatively.13 Abdominal X-ray does not help in detecting the hernia but is a useful tool if bowel obstruction is suspected.14 While ultrasound can reveal the bowel contents in hernia sac,15 CT scan remains the gold standard of diagnosis. The findings of a low-lying caecum in combination with a blind-ended tubular structure inside the femoral hernia sac and stranding of nearby fat on CT scan has 98% sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing or excluding appendicitis within a hernia sac.16 MRI has comparable sensitivity and specificity to CT scan and can be requested for patients who are allergic to contrast.17

Treatment of De Garengeot hernia is an emergency. After initial resuscitation with intravenous fluid, antibiotics and analgesia, the patient is transferred to the operation room. Due to the rarity of this condition, there is no specific guideline as for surgical procedure. Lockwood-low incision, Lotheissen transinguinal incision, and McEvedy high incision are the main open approaches for repairing the femoral hernia. Decision on choosing the most suitable approach depends on patient’s condition and also surgeon’s opinion. In Lockwood-low incision (infrainguinal approach), which is the preferred method for elective repair of the hernia, femoral canal can be accessed by making an oblique incision1 cm parallel and below the inguinal ligament. This approach has difficulties if there is bowel involvement, but is a simple method and abdominal wall is dissected less.18 The Lotheissen transinguinal approach involves making an incision superior and parallel to the inguinal ligament and extending from pubic tubercle to midinguinal point. In this type of incision, which is the favourable method when the diagnosis of inguinal and femoral hernia is in doubt, the inguinal canal is exposed as of the femoral hernia. Development of inguinal hernia in the future is the disadvantage of this procedure.18 The McEvedy high approach involves an oblique skin incision 3 cm above the pubic tubercle running laterally to cross the lateral border of the rectus muscle that is divided allowing preperitoneal dissection of the sac. This approach is preferred in the emergency setting when strangulation is suspected allowing better access to and visualisation of bowel for possible resection and can easily be converted to Pfannenstiel if full laparotomy is needed.18 The Laparoscopic approach for fixing De Garengeot hernia is still controversial.19 A laparoscopic approach with appendectomy followed by totally extraperitoneal procedure for femoral hernia repair was first reported by Beysens et al.20 Some authors have recommended the laparoscopic approach for the diagnosis and repair of groin hernias with an atypical presentation or when the contents of the hernia cannot be determined using clinical or radiological exams,21 and the advantage of this approach is short hospital stay and fast recovery.22

The main complications of De Garengeot hernia repair, which are more common in elderly patients, are wound infection with the prevalence of 14%–29% and rarely necrotising fasciitis or death.23 It is found that delay in diagnosis, poor nutritional status, older age and multiple tissue planes involved in the repair of the hernia are contributing factors to increase the incidence of postoperative infections.14 In our case, patient had an uneventful recovery period and did not develop wound infection.

Learning points

  • De Garengeot hernia is a rare type of hernia which is the presence of appendix inside a femoral hernia sac.

  • Patients usually present with signs and symptoms consistent with an incarcerated/strangulated femoral hernia and surgeons should be aware of it as one of the differential diagnosis of right lower quadrant abdominal pain.

  • Preoperative diagnosis of De Garengeot hernia can be achieved with modern imaging such as ultrasound or CT scan.

  • Surgery (appendectomy and herniorrhaphy) is the mainstay of treatment and should be done once diagnosed to prevent the complications.


  • Contributors BB involved in collecting patient's images, obtaining the consent and drafting the manuscript. CLT was the operating surgeon and did the final edit and review.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See:


Open Access

Register for free content

The full text of all Editor's Choice articles and summaries of every article are free without registration

The full text of Images in ... articles are free to registered users

Only fellows can access the full text of case reports (apart from Editor's Choice) - become a fellow today, or encourage your institution to, so that together we can grow and develop this resource

Don't forget to sign up for content alerts so you keep up to date with all the case reports as they are published, and let us know what you think by commenting on the Editor's blog