Article Text

Download PDFPDF

CASE REPORT
Penile Mondor’s disease after anterolateral retroperitoneal approach for lumbar fracture
  1. Mauro Dobran sr1,
  2. Roberta Benigni jr1,
  3. Davide Nasi sr1,
  4. Daniele Cantoro2
  1. 1Neurosurgery, Neurosurgery, Ancona, Italy, Italy
  2. 2Urology, Ancona, Italy
  1. Correspondence to Dr Mauro Dobran sr, dobran{at}libero.it

Summary

This is a rare case of thrombosis of the dorsal vein of the penis (Mondor’s disease) occurred after an anterior-lateral retroperitoneal approach for a vertebral stabilisation in thoracolumbar vertebral fracture. Potential causes are traumatism, neoplasms, excessive sexual activity or abstinence. Although penile Mondor’s disease is a clinical diagnosis, ultrasound imaging is the gold standard to confirm it. In the reported case, 1 week after neurosurgical retroperitoneal procedure of vertebral stabilisation, the patient complained of a painful cord-like mass midshaft of penis. The diagnosis was made by clinical evaluation and ultrasound images. After 2 weeks of therapy with enoxaparin sodium, the patient recovered. The authors report this case evaluating the possible correlation between the anterior-lateral retroperitoneal approach and the development of the rare Mondor’s disease.

  • venous thromboembolism
  • neurological injury
  • neurosurgery
  • urological surgery

This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors MD: conception and design of the study and writing the manuscript. RB: acquisition of data, reporting and writing the manuscript. DN: analysis and interpretation of data and review of literature. DC: critical review of manuscript and review of literature.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.