Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Giant iridodialysis with wound dehiscence following penetrating keratoplasty: an ocular emergency
Free
  1. Jayanand S Urkude,
  2. Amar Pujari,
  3. Manthan Chaniyara,
  4. Rashmi Singh
  1. Department of Ophthalmology, Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Jayanand S Urkude, drjay2910{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

Wound dehiscence is a known complication of keratoplasty which can occur even many years following the surgery. Usually trivial trauma is the causative factor for wound dehiscence, but spontaneous dehiscence has also been reported in the literature.1

A 45-year-old man presented with sudden loss of vision in the left eye following a blunt trauma. History revealed penetrating keratoplasty in the left eye for perforated corneal ulcer 2 years ago. On examination, visual acuity was hand movement close to face in the left eye and right eye being within normal limits with 20/20 visual acuity. Slit-lamp biomicroscopic examination showed broken monofilament nylon sutures leading to superior 6 clock hours (09:00 to 03:00 clock hours) of wound dehiscence, with corresponding 6 clock hours of giant iridodialysis prolapsing anteriorly (figure 1). The lens was completely extruded along with vitreous at the wound. Based on the relevant history and clinical findings, a diagnosis of giant iridodialysis secondary to wound dehiscence following blunt trauma was made. As the injury was more than 48 hours old, the prolapsed iris tissue was abscissed along with limited anterior vitrectomy followed by resuturing of the same graft to the host bed under general anaesthesia. First postoperative day showed a well-apposed graft-host junction (GHJ), with a well-formed anterior chamber (figure 2). At the end of 5 months, the patient is without any complications, and the best-corrected visual acuity is 20/80 with a well-attached retina in presence of healthy optic disc and macula.

Figure 1

Superior 6 clock hours of giant iridodialysis extending from 09:00 to 03:00 clock hours with corresponding wound dehiscence.

Figure 2

Postoperative day 1 showing well-apposed graft–host junction with minimal superior corneal oedema.

Wound dehiscence is one of the most dreaded complications following keratoplasty. GHJ healing occurs mainly at the level of endothelium and epithelium. Because of this, full thickness grafts are more prone for dehiscence as compared with lamellar grafts in which Descemet membrane and endothelium remain untouched giving extra support to transplanted cornea. The location for wound dehiscence is seen almost equal in all quadrants; in our case, the large dehiscence was located in the superior quadrant.2 Giant iridodialysis associated with wound dehiscence is rarely encountered in clinical practice. In this case, it was a large iridodialysis prolapsing out of the anterior chamber which was taken care of. The final outcome in these cases depends on many factors like time elapsed between injury and the intervention undertaken, Descemet membrane tear or detachment, tissue loss and importantly, the retinal status. Resuturing of the same graft to host bed is usually preferred rather than a new graft.

Learning points

  • Keratoplasty is the common procedure performed, which carries the lifelong risk of graft–host junctionrelated complications like wound dehiscence.

  • In cases of wound dehiscence being an ocular emergency, it should be tackled as early as possible with optimal surgical intervention for better long-term outcomes.

  • In these cases, the factors which affect the visual outcome are extent of injury, time interval between the injury and treatment initiation, lens and retinal status.

References 

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors have evaluated the case in detail and followed optimal surgical intervention for good visual outcome at the end of 5 months. They have also evaluated the critical educational value of the case and wrote the report.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.