Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Foot-strike haemolysis in an ultramarathon runner
  1. Abid A Fazal1,
  2. Mary S Whittemore2,
  3. Katharine C DeGeorge2
  1. 1 Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
  2. 2 Department of Family Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Katharine C DeGeorge, KD6FP{at}hscmail.mcc.virginia.edu

Summary

This case report describes mild anaemia and intravascular haemolysis in an otherwise healthy 41-year-old ultramarathon runner. In long-distance endurance athletes, trace gastrointestinal bleeding and plasma volume expansion are recognised sources of mild anaemia, often found incidentally. However, repetitive forceful foot striking can lead to blood cell lysis in the feet, resulting in a mild macrocytic anaemia and intravascular haemolysis, as was demonstrated in the patient described herein. Mild anaemia in runners, often called ‘runner’s pseudoanaemia’, is typically clinically insignificant and does not require intervention. However, an unexplained anaemia can cause undue worry for otherwise healthy patients and lead to costly further testing, providing an argument against routine testing with complete blood counts in healthy, asymptomatic patients.

  • general practice / family medicine
  • haematology (incl blood transfusion)
  • sports and exercise medicine

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AAF was the major contributor to writing the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. KCD initially saw the patient in clinic, provided guidance for the content of the manuscript and provided substantial editing for the manuscript. MSW revised the manuscript critically for important intellectual content.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.