Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Bilateral choroidal neovascular membrane in a young patient with Sorsby fundus dystrophy: the value of prompt treatment
  1. Nardine Menassa1,
  2. Sreekala Burgula1,
  3. Theodoros Empeslidis1,
  4. Konstantinos T Tsaousis1,2
  1. 1Department of Ophthalmology, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
  2. 2John A. Moran Eye Center, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
  1. Correspondence to Mr Konstantinos T Tsaousis, konstantinos.tsaousis{at}gmail.com

Summary

A 45-year-old man had developed a choroidal neovascular membrane (CNVM) in his left eye at the age of 38 years and had received six intravitreal ranibizumab injections with resulting visual acuities of 6/60 in the affected eye and 6/4 in the unaffected right eye (Snellen charts). Family history and genetic testing revealed tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-3 (TIMP3) gene positive Sorsby fundus dystrophy (SFD). The patient has been under regular follow-up since. At the age of 45 years, he presented with subretinal fluid accumulation in his right eye suggestive of CNVM and received six intravitreal ranibizumab injections, which maintained visual acuity of 6/7.5 in his right eye. Although SFD is a rare condition, it should be suspected and ruled out in young patients presenting with suspicious fundoscopic findings and subretinal fluid on optical coherence tomography. Early intervention can possibly delay macular fibrosis and loss of vision secondary to SFD associated with CNVM.

  • eye
  • retina
  • genetics

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors NM monitored data collection, analysed the data and drafted the paper. SB contributed in data acquisition. TE analysed data and provided administration support. KTT critically revised the paper and he is the guarantor. All authors approved submission.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.