Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Intra-articular lipoma of the hip
  1. Anthony J Mells1,
  2. G Max Gosey2,
  3. Michael P Muldoon3
  1. 1Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Rochester, MI, USA
  2. 2Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Arizona Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, AZ, USA
  3. 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA, USA
  1. Correspondence to Anthony J Mells, ajmells{at}oakland.edu

Summary

Intra-articular lipoma of the hip is a rare entity, with only two reports published in the English-language literature. We present a case of successful arthroscopic resection of an intra-articular peripheral compartment lipoma in a 69-year-old woman with a coincident labral tear. This woman presented with left hip pain that developed gradually over 2 years and increased over 2 months. MRI showed a fat-intense mass in the anterior aspect of the hip joint, convincing for intra-articular lipoma. Physical examination in the operating room reproduced decreased range of motion and evidence of impingement but with a soft endpoint. Arthroscopy revealed an anterior intrasubstance labral tear, which was debrided. The mass was excised and confirmed as true lipoma on histology. The soft endpoint on examination illustrates that a large lipoma of the hip joint can cause clinical symptoms of impingement in the absence of bony abnormality or trauma.

  • Orthopaedics
  • Musculoskeletal And Joint Disorders
  • Labral Tears
  • Orthopaedic And Trauma Surgery

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AJM wrote the case report as the primary author. GMG played an integral role in developing ideas and outlining the case report. MPM was the surgeon for the procedure and provided guidance and advice throughout the writing process.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.