Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Multifocal septic arthritis, gluteal abscess and spondylodiscitis by Streptococcus dysgalactiae subspecies equisimilis after an intramuscular injection
  1. Rita Marques Pocinho,
  2. Liliana Antunes,
  3. Pedro Pires,
  4. Isabel Baptista
  1. Department of Medicina 1.2, Hospital de São José, Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Portugal
  1. Correspondence to Dr Rita Marques Pocinho, ritapocinho{at}gmail.com

Summary

We present the case of a 63-year-old man, admitted for hand cellulitis and acute kidney injury. A Streptococcus dysgalactiae subsp equisimilis (SDSE) was isolated in blood cultures and despite directed intravenous antibiotherapy, the patient evolved unfavourably, with dorsolumbar spondylodiscitis, multifocal septic arthritis and abscesses. CT also showed densification of the gluteal muscles, multiple air bubbles in the psoas, paraspinal muscles and spinal canal that were associated with an intramuscular injection administered 1 week earlier for a backache. After escalation of the antibiotherapy and intensive supportive measures, the patient showed improvement and was discharged after 8 weeks of antibiotherapy.

The incidence of invasive SDSE infections has been growing, especially in immunosupressed patients. In this case, despite no predisposing factor identified, it evolved to severe sepsis. The intramuscular injection, a trivialised but not harmless procedure, was the assumed port of entry, as previously described in another case report.

  • contraindications and precautions
  • infectious diseases
  • healthcare improvement and patient safety

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors RMP was involved in patient management, acquisition and interpretation of scientific data, discussing, planning and writing of this paper. LA was involved in patient management, acquisition and interpretation of scientific data, and in the discussion and planning of this paper. PP was involved in patient management, acquisition and interpretation of scientific data, and in the discussion and planning of this paper. IB was involved in patient management, in the acquisition and interpretation of scientific data, clinical decision-making, discussion, planning and revision of this paper.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.