Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Successful conservative management of a permanent pacemaker pocket infection: a less invasive approach
  1. Alexander James Keeley,
  2. Daniel Hammersley,
  3. Madhava Dissanayake
  1. Department of Cardiology, Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Trust, Worthing, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Daniel Hammersley, djhammersley{at}gmail.com

Summary

We present a successful conservative management strategy for a frail elderly patient with a cardiac resynchronisation pacemaker who presented with evidence of an Enterobacter cloacae pacemaker pocket infection. A device washout and debridement procedure was performed, with reburial of the device in a new prepectoral pocket and creation of a closed-loop continuous antibiotic infusion into the infected pacemaker pocket. This was followed by a 6-week course of ambulatory intravenous antibiotic therapy. This conservative management strategy avoided the need for a more invasive and high-risk full device extraction, which the patient clearly stated he did not wish to have. Up-to-date consensus management guidelines recommend extraction of the entire implanted system in this situation; however, in this case we demonstrate an alternative conservative management option, which may be suitable for frail elderly and comorbid patients or for patients who decline device extraction.

  • cardiovascular medicine
  • pacing and electrophysiology
  • infectious diseases

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AJK and DH performed the literature search. AJK, DH and MD prepared the original manuscript. MD supplied clinical photography.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.