Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Aluminium phosphide poisoning with severe cardiac dysfunction and the role of digoxin
  1. Khalid Hamid Changal1,
  2. Muzamil Latief2,
  3. Manzoor Parry2,
  4. Farhat Abbas3
  1. 1 Department of Internal Medicine, Mercy St. Vincent's Medical Center, Toledo, Ohio, USA
  2. 2 Department of Internal Medicine, Maharishi Markandeshwar University, Mullana, India
  3. 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Government Medical College Srinagar, Srinagar, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Khalid Hamid Changal, khalidchangal{at}gmail.com

Summary

Aluminium phosphide (ALP) is a common cause of suicidal poisoning in India where it is easily available and commonly known as ‘rice tablet’. In rural areas of India, it is still used to protect rice and stored grains from rodents and pests.1 There is no specific antidote for phosphide poisoning and treatment involves meticulous supportive care. Ingestion can lead to severe cardiac suppression and cardiogenic shock. For patients poisoned with ALP who continue to have refractory shock with persistent myocardial suppression despite the use of adrenergic inotropic agents, the addition of digoxin may be beneficial. We present a case where digoxin was utilised with beneficial patient outcomes.

  • Arrhythmias
  • Heart Failure
  • Cardiovascular System

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors KHC was involved in the planning, conduct, reporting, conception and design, acquisition of data or analysis and interpretation of data and writing the manuscript. ML, MP and FA were responsible for the acquisition, analysis and interpretation of the data and editing the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.