Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Autism spectrum disorder in Say-Barber-Biesecker-Young-Simpson syndrome
  1. Jessica Merritt,
  2. Joseph C Hart,
  3. Tracy L LeGrow
  1. Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Marshall University, Huntington, West Virginia, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Joseph C Hart, joe.hart{at}marshall.edu

Summary

Say-Barber-Biesecker-Young-Simpson syndrome (SBBYSS), also known as Ohdo syndrome SBBYS type, is a rare genetic disorder characterised by dysmorphic facial features and severe intellectual disability, as well as cardiac, dental and hearing abnormalities. There has been little psychiatric or psychological description of children with SBBYSS, although previous reports noted repetitive self-injurious behaviours, sensitivity to light and noise and severe deficits in communication. In this report, a 4-year-old male with SBBYSS is described with a focus on psychiatric and psychological assessment, including formal testing for autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Results of multiple behavioural assessment scales are reported. Testing revealed characteristic ASD features, and the patient met criteria for ASD diagnosis in the context of SBBYSS. His behaviours improved with Applied Behavioural Analysis therapy and communication skills training. This is the first documented case of ASD reported alongside SBBYSS. These results suggest ASD may be a clinical feature of SBBYSS.

  • Genetics
  • Neuro genetics
  • Child and adolescent psychiatry (paediatrics)
  • Congenital disorders
  • Child and adolescent psychiatry

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors JM contributed to the literature review and the writing and editing of the paper. JH contributed to the literature review and the writing and editing of the paper. TLG evaluated the study patient and contributed to the writing and editing of the paper.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.