Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
An unusual position of retromandibular vein: a surgical challenge in parotid surgeries
  1. Prasanna Kumar Saravanam,
  2. Vinoth Manimaran
  1. Department of ENT, Head and Neck Surgery, Sri Ramachandra University Medical College, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Vinoth Manimaran, vinomb88{at}gmail.com

Summary

A 44-year-old man presented with swelling in the left parotid region. The swelling was firm and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology report proved pleomorphic adenoma. In the CT scan, the tumour was confined to the superficial lobe of parotid. So, left superficial parotidectomy was planned. Modified Wilson Blair’s incision was used. On course of identifying the facial nerve, a large calibre vein was identified running vertically through the parotid substance. Assuming it as retromandibular vein, further dissection was carried out more meticulously. Marginal mandibularbranch of facial nerve was identified near the angle of mandible and retrograde dissection showed the cervicofacial division running medial to retromandibular vein with the main facial nerve trunk lying unusually medial and posterior to it. Adding to it, the temporofacial division was found ‘forked’ between the branches of retromandibular vein. These variations in head and neck venous channels are not that rare as we believe. All these variations have an embryological basis. Therefore, knowledge and understanding of this complex anatomy will help us preventing devastating complications like bleeding and facial nerve injury in such cases.

  • Ear, nose and throat/otolaryngology
  • Otolaryngology / ENT

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors Both authors functioned as a team and so shared their contributorship.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.