Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Exploring inside a shaggy aorta using non-obstructive angioscopy
  1. Sei Komatsu,
  2. Satoru Takahashi,
  3. Yasuyuki Toyama,
  4. Kazuhisa Kodama
  1. Cardiovascular Center, Osaka Gyoumeikan Hospital, Osaka, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Sei Komatsu, plaquemap{at}yahoo.co.jp

Summary

A shaggy aorta is reportedly related to atheromatous embolisation, which causes serious ischaemic damage to various organs. However, its characteristics are poorly understood. Non-obstructive angioscopy (NOA) has been developed to safely detect aortic plaques and injuries. A 70-year-old woman who was found to have a shaggy aorta on CT angiography underwent NOA for precise evaluation of vulnerable aortic plaques and injuries inside the aorta. Vulnerable aortic plaques included puff-like ruptures, chandelier-like ruptures and erosions seen throughout the aorta. Aortic injuries included flaps, slits, subintimal bleeding, dissection and multilayered partitions. The patient had no embolic symptoms or an elevated eosinophil count, estimated glomerular filtration rate or C reactive protein level, compared with the baseline. Various changes in spontaneous vulnerable plaques and injuries inside the aorta that were not apparent on CT were safely revealed on NOA. Thus, NOA may reveal findings indicative of spontaneous and postoperative atheromatous embolisation.

  • Cardiovascular medicine
  • Interventional cardiology
  • Interventional radiology

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors SK, ST, YT and KK contributed to the conception and planning of the work. ST and YT participated in the conduct and SK wrote the manuscript. SK, ST, YT and KK gave final approval of the version published. SK was responsible for the overall content as guarantor.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.