Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Emergency cricothyroidotomy following tracheobronchial stenting
  1. Simon Robert Cavinato1,
  2. Mike Denning2,
  3. Brendan P Madden3
  1. 1Department of Cardiothoracic Intensive Care, Saint George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  2. 2Saint George's Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
  3. 3Department of Cardiothoracic, ST Georges Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
  1. Correspondence to Dr Simon Robert Cavinato, simoncavinato{at}gmail.com

Summary

A man aged 51 years was referred for tracheobronchial stenting after a poorly differentiated oesophageal carcinoma had progressed to cause stridor. Bronchoscopy revealed a left vocal cord palsy and tumour infiltration into the trachea. A tracheobronchial stent was placed, and after distal migration was endoscopically resited. Returning from theatre, the patient developed severe upper airway obstruction that progressed to cause CO2 narcosis and loss of consciousness. A rapid sequence induction was initiated, and a Glidescope revealed bilateral vocal cord palsy with severe oedema causing an inability to pass a tube or stylet. Tracheostomy was attempted above the suprasternal notch but was obstructed by the stent. Oxygen saturations dropped steadily, reaching as low as 38%. Emergency cricothyroidotomy was performed, compliant with DAS guidelines, that proved successful. The stent was removed, which was blocked with blood and secretions, and tracheostomy was placed 2 days later. The patient made a full neurological recovery.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors MD helped to plan the report, cowrote sections of both the background and discussion, provided opinion on details, and edited the paper. BPM helped to plan the report, provided expert opinion and clarification of details, and edited the paper.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.