Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Effect of non-pharmacological intervention for apathy: response to one-on-one reminiscence-based intervention
  1. Akira Okada,
  2. Tetsuya Ueda
  1. Faculty of Medicine, Department of Neuropsychiatry, Nara Hospital, Kinki University, Ikoma, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Akira Okada, okadada{at}nike.eonet.ne.jp

Summary

Apathy has adverse consequences for patients and caregivers. However, the therapeutic approach remains uncertain. Here, we present the case of a man aged 67 years who only developed apathy after surgery for oesophageal cancer. He showed no response to intervention with donepezil, a ‘brain training’ video game and psychoeducation for apathy. Subsequently, we implemented a programme designed to facilitate recall of 2 themes (editorial content and television shows during the week) once a week. After 3 months, the scores of 2 apathy scales rated by the patient's wife, psychological test scores and brain perfusion single-photon emission CT data improved compared with those obtained before intervention. These results may be attributable to activated 2-way communication as well as benefits of reminiscence therapy, as seen in patients with dementia. Further studies are needed to develop additional non-pharmacological interventions that activate 2-way communication for apathetic patients in ways appropriate to their interests and comorbidities.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AO identified and managed the case, and is the guarantor of the paper. TU was responsible for the programme of one-on-one reminiscence-based intervention and the assessment of psychological tests.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.