Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Extraskeletal orbital mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: surgical approach and mini review
  1. Ashish Jakhetiya1,
  2. Nootan Kumar Shukla1,
  3. Dillip Muduly1,
  4. Shashank S Kale2
  1. 1Department of Surgical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, NewDelhi, India
  2. 2Department of Neurosurgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Ashish Jakhetiya, ashish_jakhetiya{at}yahoo.com

Summary

Extraskeletal orbital mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MC) is an extremely rare and highly aggressive tumour. It has characteristic radiological features and pathognomic histological biphasic pattern. Radical resection with negative margins is the mainstay of treatment; role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy is yet not well defined. We report a rare case of 18-year-old man who was diagnosed to have orbital MC. He presented with locally advanced disease with no vision in the affected eye. He underwent right orbital exenteration; a transcranial intradural approach was used to divide the optic nerve, and the temporalis muscle flap was utilised to fill the exenterated orbit. Though optic nerve involvement is rare in orbital MCs, a transcranial approach may be used effectively to avoid traction on optic chiasma and ensure margin-free resection in case of optic nerve involvement up to orbital apex. Unfortunately, prognosis remains dismal in MCs despite treatment.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AJ and NKS contributed to concept, study design, literature search, manuscript preparation, manuscript review, operating surgeon and final approval of the manuscript. DM contributed to literature search, manuscript preparation, operating surgeon and final approval of the manuscript. SSK contributed to concept, manuscript review, operating surgeon and final approval of the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.