Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
The clinical conundrum of diagnosing and treating systemic sarcoidosis in a high TB burden area
  1. Krishnadas Thulasidoss1,
  2. Lavanya Asokan1,
  3. Piyush Chandra2,
  4. Pravinkumar Rejliwal1
  1. 1Internal Medicine, MIOT International, Chennai, India
  2. 2Nuclear Medicine, MIOT International, Chennai, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Krishnadas Thulasidoss, tkrisnadas{at}gmail.com

Summary

A 53-year-old woman from Southern India presented with weight loss, anorexia, fever and asthenia. Whole body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET-CT) showed fluorodeoxyglucose-avid mediastinal and abdominal lymphadenopathy with hepatic, splenic, parotid and lacrimal glandular inflammations. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration of subcarinal lymph node showed non-caseating granulomas. Initial serum ACE level was elevated but with normal calcium. Despite the suspicion of sarcoidosis, a trial of antituberculosis therapy was started empirically due to similar presentations of disseminated tuberculosis (TB) in this high endemic area. The patient subsequently deteriorated and was admitted with symptomatic hypercalcaemia. Her subsequent ACE levels were very high, supportive of a diagnosis of systemic sarcoidosis. She was given steroid pulse therapy, and 5 months later had fully recovered. This case highlights the challenges faced by physicians in high TB-endemic areas when managing granulomatous diseases as they are concerned about missing TB, the difficulties in diagnosing sarcoidosis and the role of pulse steroid therapy.

  • Immunological products and vaccines
  • TB and other respiratory infections
  • Pathology
  • Radiology
  • Endoscopy

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors KT, LA and PR contributed to writing the clinical and pathological aspects of the report; PC contributed to the radiological aspect of the report.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.