Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
False-negative contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: use of more than one imaging modality and application of the triple test avoids misdiagnosis
  1. Donna Taylor1,
  2. Susan O'Hanlon1,
  3. Bruce Latham2
  1. 1Department of Radiology, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
  2. 2Department of PathWest, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Donna Taylor; Donna.Taylor{at}health.wa.gov.au

Summary

A 50-year-old woman presented with chest tenderness. On examination, both breasts were lumpy. Bilateral mammography showed heterogeneously dense parenchyma, with possible stromal distortion laterally on the right at the 0900 position. On ultrasound (US), a corresponding 13×9×10 mm irregular hypoechoic mass with internal vascularity was noted and both breasts had a complex heterogeneous fibroglandular background pattern. US-guided core biopsy with marker clip insertion was performed with the diagnosis of a grade 2 invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). In view of the parenchymal pattern on mammography and US, contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) was performed for local staging. Mild background enhancement was noted, but there was no enhancement at the lesion site. The patient elected to have bilateral mastectomies and sentinel node biopsies. Final histopathology showed a node negative 11 mm grade 2 oestrogen and progesterone receptor positive, IDC.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors DT, SO'H and BL collected the data. DT, SO'H, BL prepared the manuscript. DT, SO'H, BL contributed in manuscript editing and proofing.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.