Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Alternative method of tractioning the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube
Free
  1. Evelyn Patricia Murphy1,
  2. Sean Michael O'Brien2,
  3. Mark Regan3
  1. 1Department of Orthopaedics, University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
  2. 2Department of General Surgery, University College Hospital Galway, Galway, Ireland
  3. 3Department of GI/Surgery, Galway University Hospitals Group, Galway, Ireland
  1. Correspondence to Dr Evelyn Patricia Murphy, evelynmurphy{at}hotmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

Oesophageal varices commonly develop in the setting of portal hypertension. A Sengstaken-Blakemore (SB) tube is sometimes emergently required to control oesophageal bleeding.1 ,2

The normal portal pressure varies from 5 to 10 mm Hg. Portal hypertension occurs when the portal pressure rises above 10 mm Hg. Pressures can rise up to 30 mm Hg, so the pressure exerted and maintained on the oesophageal balloon to tamponade the varices will need to be above 30 mm Hg.

The current practice is to attach a 1 L bag of saline to the tube to maintain traction. However, there are risks associated with this method of traction. These risks include pharyngeal ulcers and mouth ulcers from the local pressure effect. We describe an alternative method of maintaining traction on the SB tube.

We describe the practice of securing the tube with a pair of wooden tongue depressors and padding as shown in figure 1. This has been used by the lead author for 25 years with no adverse events. The patient population includes patients with oesophageal varices. The patients ranged from 18 to 85 years of age. Over 50 patients have been treated by the lead author using this method.

Figure 1

Traction device in use on a patient.

This is an alternative safe …

View Full Text

Footnotes

  • Contributors EPM used the device. SMOB proof read the manuscript and performed literature review. MR devised the device and proof read the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.