Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Chronic hypertension, recreational cocaine use and a subsequent acute aortic dissection in a young adult
  1. Krista Dewar1,
  2. Seonaid Nolan1,2
  1. 1British Columbia Centre on Substance Use, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  2. 2Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  1. Correspondence to Dr Seonaid Nolan, seonaidn{at}gmail.com

Summary

Cocaine is a widely used illicit substance and has previously been described as a risk factor for aortic dissection. We present a case of a young recreational cocaine user with uncontrolled hypertension who presented to hospital with acute chest pain and was diagnosed with an acute aortic dissection. The patient’s last use of powdered cocaine was 3 days prior. A workup for secondary hypertension was negative and no other risk factors for aortic dissection were determined. In hospital, the patient was medically managed with multiple antihypertensive agents, was provided with education regarding the risk of ongoing stimulant use and resources to support his goal of abstinence. This case highlights the importance of considering a diagnosis of aortic dissection in a young patient presenting with acute chest pain, underscores the need for a thorough substance use history and provides a novel example of the potential danger of even recreational cocaine use.

  • Hypertension
  • Cardiovascular System
  • Drug Misuse (including Addiction)

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors KD conducted the literature search and wrote the initial draft of the case report. SN edited and approved the final product.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.