Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Supraventricular tachycardia diagnosed by smartphone ECG
  1. Ariana Tabing1,
  2. Travis Edward Harrell2,
  3. Steven Romero2,
  4. Gregory Francisco2
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
  2. 2Department of Cardiology, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Travis Edward Harrell, travis.harrell{at}gmail.com

Summary

Diagnosis of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) may be difficult due to its episodic nature, which can be brief and self-limited, limiting the ability for clinicians to diagnose the specific rhythm disorder in a timely manner. We present a case of PSVT, which was unable to be diagnosed through typical evaluation with an event monitor despite several years of symptoms. The patient was ultimately diagnosed using the AliveCor Mobile ECG, a smartphone-based ECG device and application, which he purchased himself and captured a typical atrioventricular node re-entrant tachycardia. The patient was then able to email his cardiologist the tracing, which led to an electrophysiology study and successful slow pathway ablation procedure. Smartphone-based technology has the potential to push diagnostic evaluations outside of the healthcare system and empower patients.

  • arrhythmias
  • pacing and electrophysiology
  • clinical diagnostic tests

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors AT and TEH contributed equally to the creation of the manuscript, performed the literature search and identified and edited the images for publication. SR and GF each identified and managed the case, had the initial conception of the case report and edited the manuscript to prepare it publication.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.