Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
A rare cause of constrictive pericarditis
  1. Shane Patrick Flood1,
  2. Omar Ayah1,
  3. Satoshi Furukawa2,
  4. Robert B Norris3
  1. 1Department of Internal Medicine, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  2. 2Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  3. 3Cardiovascular Medicine Division, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Shane Patrick Flood, shane.flood{at}uphs.upenn.edu

Summary

A 67-year-old man presented with 3 months of exertional dyspnoea and 1 week of oedema. Examination revealed elevated neck veins, pulsus paradoxus, muffled heart sounds, decreased breath sounds and pedal oedema. Transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) demonstrated cardiac tamponade, and chest X-ray showed pleural effusion. Pericardiocentesis, thoracocentesis, laboratory investigations and CT did not elucidate an underlying aetiology. Three weeks later, he presented with recurrent cardiac tamponade and pleural effusion. Pericardial window histology was benign. Pleural and pericardial fluids were again unrevealing. Three months later, he presented with worsening congestive heart failure. TTE, cardiac catheterisation and cardiac MRI were consistent with constrictive pericarditis. Preoperative workup did not identify an underlying cause. The patient underwent subtotal pericardiectomy. Intraoperative frozen section indicated malignancy. Pathology confirmed metastatic poorly differentiated signet ring adenocarcinoma of intestinal origin. He died 4 days postoperatively from multiorgan failure.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors SPF and OA contributed equally to researching, writing and editing the manuscript. SF contributed the perioperative details. RBN wrote part of the discussion and edited the manuscript.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.