Article Text

Download PDFPDF
CASE REPORT
Young man with sudden severe hip pain secondary to femoral neck stress fracture
  1. Ziva Petrin1,
  2. Anupam Sinha2,
  3. Sunny Gupta3,
  4. Mitesh K Patel3
  1. 1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  2. 2Department of PM&R, Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  3. 3Rothman Institute, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
  1. Correspondence to Dr Anupam Sinha, anupam.sinha{at}rothmaninstitute.com

Summary

Femoral neck stress fractures have been described in military recruits and athletes. Early recognition and aggressive treatment are important, as femoral neck stress fractures have a high potential for complications and even uncomplicated fractures require an extensive course of rehabilitation. Tension-side (superolateral) stress fractures of the femoral neck are at high risk for complications such as displacement, non-union and avascular necrosis, and need to be treated surgically, while compression-side (inferomedial) fractures can be treated conservatively. We describe a case illustrating a typical presentation of insidious hip pain culminating in sudden onset of severe hip pain in a healthy young man. We perform a literature review of studies showing epidemiology, treatment algorithms and rehabilitation.

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors contributed a significant amount to the data collection, write-up and editing of the article. SG, AS and MKP collected initial data including history, examination and imaging. SG and ZP obtained patient consent. ZP wrote the initial document version, which was edited by SG, AS and MKP. Final version was agreed on and vetted by ZP, AS, SG and MKP.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.