Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Macrofocal multiple myeloma with frontal plasmacytoma
Free
  1. Kamal Kant Sahu1,
  2. Pramod DA Kumar2,
  3. Uday Yanamandra1,3,
  4. Pankaj Malhotra1
  1. 1Departments of Hematology and Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
  2. 2Department of Internal Medicine, Post Graduate Institue of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
  3. 3Department of Internal Medicine, Armed Forces Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India
  1. Correspondence to Dr Uday Yanamandra, udayj2{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

A 27-year-old man presented with a 5-month history of left-sided forehead swelling. The patient had no other symptoms. Examination was unremarkable except for pallor and swelling of the left frontal bone displacing the orbit in a downward and outward direction (figure 1A, B).

Figure 1

(A) Frontal view showing protuberant mass in left forehead causing downwards and outwards displacement of orbit pretherapy. (B) Left lateral view showing protuberant mass in left forehead causing downwards displacement of orbit pretherapy. (C and D) Frontal and left lateral views showing resolution of forehead swelling postchemotherapy.

The patient had normochromic normocytic anaemia (haemoglobin 8.7 g/dL) with normal total leucocyte count (3900/µL) and platelet count (200 000/µL). His renal parameters (urea 29 mg/dL, creatine 0.66 mg/dL) as well as serum calcium level (9.2 mg/dL) were normal. Positron emission tomography CT showed intense fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in left frontal region accompanied by multiple lytic lesions (figure 2A–D). Fine-needle aspiration from forehead swelling was suggestive of plasmacytoma (figure 3). Bone marrow showed 8% plasma cells. There was no paraproteinaemia, based on normal serum/urine protein electrophoresis and serum immunofixation. A serum β2-microglobulin (2.1 mg/L) and serum free light chain study was normal. Diagnosis of macrofocal multiple myeloma (ISS-I, C-R-A+B+) was made.

Figure 2

(A) X-ray of the skull (Water's view) showing increased scalloping of frontal sinus of left as compared with right side (pretherapy). (B–D) Positron emission tomography CT showing intense fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in the heterogeneously enhancing soft tissue mass lesion in the left frontal, manubrium sterni, multiple vertebral bones and right head of the tibia (pretherapy).

Figure 3

Fine-needle aspiration from the forehead swelling showing infiltration by plasma cells suggestive of plasmacytoma (H&E staining—oil immersion—×1000).

The patient received six cycles of chemotherapy (dexamethasone 40 mg weekly, thalidomide 100 mg daily) followed by thalidomide maintenance owing to financial constraints and non-affordability for autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation. His forehead swelling disappeared following three cycles (figure 1C, D).

Presence of extramedullary plasmacytoma (commonly involving soft tissue, lungs, pleura, genitourinary system and skull) is associated with poor outcome.1 Macrofocal multiple myeloma is a distinct entity (with multiple lytic lesions and no bone marrow involvement) with superior rates of survival.2 Orbital plasmacytomas are treated differently by various authors, using radiotherapy, local dexamethasone injection or systemic chemotherapy.3

Learning points

  • Macrofocal multiple myelomas have improved rates of survival owing to low tumour burden despite multiple lytic bone lesions.

  • Macrofocal multiple myelomas have higher response rates to primary treatment.

  • Patients are treated either with radiotherapy or chemotherapy in extramedullary plasmacytomas and macrofocal multiple myeloma.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the cooperation extended by Professor BR Mittal and the Nuclear Medicine Department.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Contributors All authors were actively involved in the management of the patient at various stages of his illness. UY and KKS were involved in manuscript preparation.

  • Competing interests None declared.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.