Article Text
Statistics from Altmetric.com
Description
A 65-year-old non-smoker and former worker of the Hindustan Composites Asbestos factory, Mumbai, was screened at the Occupational Health and Safety Centre, Mumbai, which has helped diagnose and compensate occupational diseases including asbestosis since 1988.1 He had 28 years of exposure to asbestos as a worker in the textile-plating department, a dusty section of the factory. He was asymptomatic and had no relevant clinical signs. His chest X-ray showed evidence of asbestosis: ILO (International Labour Organization) grading s/s; 1/0 (figure 1). Nine months later, he developed dyspnoea and a repeat X-ray (figure 2) and a positron emission tomography (PET)-CT (figure 3) showed evidence of lung cancer in the hilar region of the left lung infiltrating into the left bronchus and the pulmonary artery. He received palliative care before he died 4 months later. He was compensated for both asbestosis and lung cancer.
Although parenchymal asbestosis can lead to lung cancer, there is no direct relationship between pulmonary fibrosis and the subsequent development of lung cancer, nor is it possible to predict the time frame as to the development of lung cancer.2 The critical issue is the frequency of radiological screening among former workers so that lung cancer can be detected early leading to a better prognosis. A recent consensus document suggested 3–5 yearly chest X-rays as a follow-up surveillance for former asbestos-exposed workers.3 The case clearly shows that the suggested frequency of follow-up surveillance is insufficient to detect asbestos-related lung cancer at a curable stage.
Learning points
-
Lung cancer can rapidly develop in workers formerly exposed to asbestos within a short time frame of less than 1 year.
-
Lung cancer screening of asbestosis-affected workers (presently working or ex-employees) should be performed at much more frequent intervals than the current recommendation of 3–5 years’ intervals.
Acknowledgments
I wish to thank Sowmya Sivakumar for proof reading.
Footnotes
-
Competing interests None declared.
-
Patient consent Obtained.
-
Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.