Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Iatrogenic brachiocephalic vein perforation during pacemaker implantation
Free
  1. Keisuke Nakabayashi
  1. Department of Cardiology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, Japan
  1. Correspondence to Dr Keisuke Nakabayashi, keisuke2018{at}gmail.com

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Description

An 82-year-old man with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease received a pacemaker implantation because of his advanced atrioventricular block. We smoothly inserted two sheaths by extrathoracic puncture into the left subclavian region. Mild resistance appeared at the proximal brachiocephalic vein (BCV). Venography revealed blood flow to the superior vena cava (figure 1A). However, we felt more resistance in the upper right atrium and could not propel two leads into the right atrium and right ventricle. Re-venography showed emigration of contrast into the anterior mediastinum (figure 1B). We diagnosed the patient with iatrogenic BCV perforation. His haemodynamics were stable; therefore, we pulled back the sheaths near the puncture sites and manipulated the ventricular lead into the right ventricular apex guided by pooled contrast. Instead of using an atrial lead, we implanted the VVI pacemaker to avoid expanding the perforation site.

Figure 1

Venography during pacemaker implantation. (A) There is mild resistance, but the first venography showing a contrast stream from the left brachiocephalic vein to the superior vena cava (black arrow). (B) The second venography showing emigration of contrast to the anterior mediastinum from the left brachiocephalic vein to the upper right atrium.

Contrast-enhanced CT immediately after the procedure showed a haematoma and the pooled contrast in the anterior mediastinum (figure 2A, C); however, there was no haematoma growth following the delayed phase. We chose conservative therapy (ie, erythrocyte transfusion) and close monitoring. Follow-up CT confirmed no haematoma growth. The patient was discharged 7 days after the procedure.

Figure 2

Contrast-enhanced CT. (A) Sagittal view. (B) Axial view of the yellow B line. (C) Axial view of the yellow C line. The white arrowhead indicates the pooled contrast. The red arrowhead indicates the strong tortuosity of the left brachiocephalic vein.

From an anatomical viewpoint, the left BCV generally descends forward from the left and turns backwards in the middle of the anterior mediastinum.1 This case showed the strong tortuosity of the BCV (figure 2B). Therefore, knowledge of the anatomical characteristics of the left BCV is important, and the leads must be gently manipulated.

Learning points

  • The left brachiocephalic vein is a common access for pacemaker implantation.

  • Iatrogenic brachiocephalic vein perforation is a rare complication during pacemaker implantation, yet it is associated with life-threatening risks.

  • Physicians must pay careful attention to the anatomical characteristics of the brachiocephalic vein, and gentle lead manipulation is necessary.

Reference

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Patient consent Obtained.

  • Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.